(Traduce en español/translate to Spanish) By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981,  LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) July 16, 2026; *UPDATED same day to include the collaboration with Pope Leo of Ukraine’s 2022 Nobel Peace Prize-winner, Oleksandra Matviichuk (see my interview with her just months before she won the Prize) and *UPDATED July 18th to refine points on Calvinism and modern Christianity, adding some relevant sources on that note; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Elon Musk’s takeover of Twitter means my content is actively suppressed, so your help is invaluable. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. See my related AI Reading List here.

SILVER SPRING—At great risk of losing my audience, duty compels me to start this article with a massive disclosure (please stay with me, Believers, as you will appreciate what comes after the disclosure!).  As an avowed nonbeliever/nontheist, I overall despise Christianity, the Catholic Church, the papacy, and religion in general—including all major religions equally both in concept and in practice (I here separate major religions from subsects)—for ample, demonstrable reasons played out over thousands of years.  Yet remember how I said I despise them equally: I will defend Muslims from bigoted attacks from Christians, or Christians from bigoted attacks from Hindus (random examples, not meant to convey deeper meaning in their selection!), and defend all their human rights, including to practice their religion freely (so long as they are not harming others).  The late, great Christopher Hitchens sums up his views and mine nicely here in his classic Letters to a Young Contrarian:

In order to be absolutely honest, I should not leave you with the impression that I am part of the generalized agnosticism of our culture.  I am not even an atheist so much as I am an antitheist; I not only maintain that all religions are versions of the same untruth, but I hold that the influence of churches, and the effect of religious belief is positively harmful.  Reviewing the false claims of religion, I do not wish, as some sentimental materialists affect to wish, that they were true. I do not envy believers their faith.  I am relieved to think that the whole story is a sinister fairy tale; life would be miserable if what the faithful affirmed was actually the case.

That does not mean that there are not things that I do not like and value about each and every one of these faiths, or that I hate most adherents of Christianity or any religion: I do not.  In the end, I am a Humanist who loves people above all else.  Yet I am very much an antitheist, a nonbeliever in any of that mumbo-jumbo some of you may think is necessary to save my soul (and while I do genuinely appreciate the concern to the degree that it represents concern for my well-being, any attempts at proselytization or conversion will be either ignored or trolled, yet money is always accepted in my struggling freelance state).  I happen to be an ex-Catholic and have a soft-spot for the very recent modern iteration of the Catholic Church (especially some of its better social teachings and charity work, led by Catholic Relief Services, actually one of the premier global relief charities) while also being extremely critical of the Church, a Church I left in disgust in the later half of the first decade of the twenty-first century.  And I am not going back or signing up for any other divinity-focused team.

So, that fact that Pope Leo XIV’s elegant encyclical hit me like the River Isen bursting through the dam in The Two Towers really says something.  I was not expecting Leo—and, by default the Church he leads—to become the salient moral and ethical voice on AI…

One of the remarkable things about Leo’s foray into the public square on the topic of AI is that he is less concerned with centering his arguments on God than on people; indeed, his encyclical translates in English to “Magnificent Humanity,” a resoundingly uplifting, positive, and hopeful document on the possibilities and wonders of human nature.  *This is absolutely a rebuke to the spirit of Calvinism and America’s sick Evangelical Christianity, of the concept of the Elect, of the gospel of wealth/prosperity gospel, of the idea that God would damn most people to eternal hellfire (when it comes to hell itself, one of the most profound early Church Fathers, Origen of Alexandria [c. 185-c. 254 C.E.], did not even accept its existence, and for this and other kindnesses and beliefs he was undermined by rivals in his lifetime and excommunicated posthumously [apparently, technically “anathematized,” oh, Catholicism…].  Origen would have found himself in good company some sixteen centuries later, half-a-world away: as a non-theologian, Abraham Lincoln probably gave us some of the most profound meditations on faith of any major leader in history, and he, too, found it silly and dreadful to have hell or believe in it).

To me, more than it is about “God” or Jesus or Christianity or religion, this encyclical is a document that is a robust defense of humans—their spirit, achievements, dignity, and possibilities—against their denigration, commodification, deprioritization, and oppression.  Just as the subtitle—“On safeguarding the human person in the time of Artificial Intelligence”—states, it is a collective societal path for fighting dehumanization in a dehumanizing age, one that seeks, using AI, to elevate a tiny handful of humans and AI over the entire rest of our species, replacing our diverse ethical, moral, and philosophical systems with their fascist systems of dopamine manipulation that worship money and themselves as gods, not people in general, let alone “God.” Make no mistake about it, these big tech oligarchs are aligned with Trump and are as soulless as he is—Anthropic notwithstanding—and are firmly in the driver’s seat; thus, while Leo’s entrance here is an act of leadership, it is also a primal scream of panic for our species, a papal version of smashing the glass and pulling the alarm.

As for your imaginary friend(s), he/she/they do not concern me here.  Much like an edition of the Bible compiled by Thomas Jefferson that removed all the religious, superstitious, and miracle inventions in favor of focusing on the actual teachings and meanings of Jesus for how to behave in a crazy world (see and read the digitized original!), Leo’s exhilarating encyclical is an inclusive roadmap for all when you separate the Christian religious stuff from its more temporal substance; however you feel about the ethereal metaphysics, the rest of it stands on its own just like Mr. Jefferson’s Bible, as needed a relevant message and wake-up call as anything else out there today.

I am not going to remove those religious references or attack them specifically herein (other than to give you Immanuel Kant’s famous quote from the same era as Jefferson: “Metaphysics is a dark ocean without shores or lighthouse, strewn with many a philosophic wreck.”), I leave them here while not endorsing them and heartily endorsing the rest. On that note…

Behold, be ye of faith, little faith, or no faith, the wonder that is Magnifica Humanitas in stained-glass, even hieroglyphics or graphic novel form—whatever you want to call it—these infographics speak not only for themselves, but for all of us fighting for humanity over hate and machines, greed and dehumanization (click on any to zoom)!

If you prefer, you can view the infographics as a slide show:

Or download as PDFs.

With all this and more, maybe we can even win over some of the hearts and minds on the other side.  I consider Anthropic to be one of the main exceptions among the big teach companies on trying to provide moral and ethical leadership on AI (the rest seem mostly to be the problem), whether by saying no to Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon on the one hand or by partnering with the Vatican and Pope Leo on the other, and the fact that the latter are partnering with Anthropic inspires in me at least some measure of hope.

Having said that, I think the forces stacked against us are formidable and what seem to be Anthropic’s good intentions may be too little, too late.  And yet, for now, let us who want to advance the collective cause of humanity keep fighting like we have a chance and use Leo’s empathetic encyclical (including its pictures-worth-a-million-words) as a moral and ethical North Star, a Phial of Galadriel (“May it be a light for you in dark places, when all other lights go out”), a light for those with hearts seeking illumination in these dark times.  *Carrying far more moral weight than Anthropic and perhaps akin to Galadriel herself, Ukraine’s 2022 Nobel Peace Prize-winner, Oleksandra Matviichuk (see my interview with her just months before she won the Prize), is also welcomingly collaborating with the Vatican on this alongside many other Nobel laureates; and, much like Leo, Matviichuk sees us losing our humanity under assault from AI and the tech companies pushing AI onto us, even citing the horrific targeting abuses of AI in Gaza as used by the Israeli military.  Noting the depraved “human safari” expeditions carried out by Russian military forces killing her fellow Ukrainians for amusement, she asks: “If Russians are capable of this while a human operator still sits behind the drone—what kind of hell awaits us once they do it with AI?”

Somehow, I have to figure how to combine Leo’s Magnifica Humanitas with Andor, and then we might be saved.  Both the Catholic Church and Disney have been weak for some time in many ways, and then, somehow, they give us this encyclical and Andor… so maybe miracles are possible, with both the Catholic Church and Disney being something akin to John the Baptist’s mother, Elizabeth, birthing him when she was infertile? (Perhaps I am getting carried away sourcing fiction here, between Tolkien, Star Wars, and the Bible…).  But even without miracles, Leo and his team are showing the way forward so transcendently, so beautifully, so effectively with this encyclical and its series of five epic infographics, the stained-glass windows for the cataclysm of our current AI-era.  Stained-glass windows were not just art: for many centuries, they could could tell stories for illiterate peasants clogging the pews or gawking at Cathedrals from the outside, and, after reading about the death of reading à la Rose Horowitch in The Atlantic and watching Yuval Noah Harari explain recently why both liberalism as a world order is fading and AI is its enemy driving us into terrifying new world order, let us make sure it is not an apocalypse.

See my related AI Reading List here.

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!

(Traduce en español/translate to Spanish)

By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) June 5, 2026; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. All other editions of the Real Context News AI Reading List can be found here. And be sure to check out my related book review of Nicole Perlroth’s must-read, award-winning book on cyberwarfare as well as my own work on cyberwarfare.

Dear readers, I’m 44 years old.  And I’ve never seen anything like this (could apply to multiple stories but hey, let’s do this one).

In the span of about not even two weeks, the following has just happened:

We had a pope come out with a moral and ethical wakeup call at a time when one wondered if the Catholic Church was ever going to truly matter in a profound way on the international stage again.

That in itself is truly a miracle.

Yes, Pope Leo XVI roared like his namesake predecessor and like the lion he is that, yes, there was still going to be profound moral leadership in a global sense in the era of Trump 2.0, and he did so with one of AI giant Anthropic’s co-founders, Chritopher Olah, who, despite looking like a teenager, is a relative moral titan for his industry in joining the pope in what I dare say is sounding like a crusade (maybe the first good one).  Leo uses the word “disarm” for AI, and he made it damn clear he was not mincing words.

Then, about a week later, at the very end of a long update from The Anthropic Institute that very much reads like a research paper, I see something I’ve never really seen before from a company describing its own technology.  They are flat-out telling use they have lost control of their experiment, and it may have become Skynet as in T2 Terminator 2 (just as I warned when I launched this List, more humorously than now, and not thinking it was possibly a few months away), that they basically don’t know if we can even know for sure, are clearly having a moral crisis of conscience at being one of the driving forces behind this possible calamity, and are desperately trying to put on the brakes and, at least for now, saying we need to stop to be safe or a sentient AI may very well deem us a threat and, well… watch the movies.  They—some of them barely not kids—sound like they’ve lost control of their version of Frankenstein’s monster, warning us repeatedly recently, but now are officially primally screaming out for help with a megaphone into the world for all to hear, that we have to at least “pause” this madness.

Of all people, Mitt Romney totally freaked out about this.  In a very non-Mitt way.  I don’t blame him.

Magnifica Humanitas/Magnificent Humanity—Pope Leo XIV; The Vatican.

When AI Builds Itself—Marina Favaro and Jack Clark, edited by Santi Ruiz; The Anthropic Institute.

More on this to come.

I’m done with this shit for tonight. GO KNICKS!!!

Next time, hopefully another special edition of the List, this time (unless some other crazy stuff happens) on of the List on the Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman OpenAI/ChatGPT trial that just concluded. And if you want to spread the word?  It’s easy:  AI reading list dot com: AIreadinglist.com!

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!

(Traduce en español/translate to Spanish)

By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) May 24, 2026; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. All other editions of the Real Context News AI Reading List can be found here. And be sure to check out my related book review of Nicole Perlroth’s must-read, award-winning book on cyberwarfare as well as my own work on cyberwarfare. And finally, apologies for the delay, so here’s a real meaty edition on a meaty topic!

Let’s jump into it! Mythos, a particular iteration of the artificial intelligence juggernaut Anthropic’s Claude large language model (LLM) chatbot, is here and doing its thing in the form of Anthropic’s Project Glasswing.

Yes, these tech people are way too in love with their naming schemes, but the bottom line is that Anthropic just announced it has been using its new Mythos version (still in development and often more specifically referred to as Mythos Preview) of the Claude LLM in a massive project with some of the biggest names in tech overall: Amazon Web Services, Apple, Broadcom, Cisco, CrowdStrike, Google, JPMorganChase, the Linux Foundation, Microsoft, NVIDIA, and Palo Alto Networks that has been something of a secret, but is now unveiled as Project Glasswing.

First, let’s start with a few primers on what, exactly, the Mythos (Mythos Preview) edition of Anthropic’s Claude LLM model actually is:

• Anthropic’s Mythos Will Force a Cybersecurity Reckoning—Just Not the One You Think—Lily Hay Newman; Wired.
• What is Claude Mythos and what risks does it pose?—Liv McMahon Joe Tidy; BBC News.
• It’s the End of the Internet as We Know It—Raffi Krikorian (Mozilla CTO); The New York Times.
• What is Mythos, Anthropic’s unreleased AI model, and how worried should we be?—Chris Stokel-Walker (edited by Eric Sullivan); Scientific American.
• What is Mythos AI and why could it be a threat to global cybersecurity?—Dan Milmo, Kalyeena Makortoff, and Aisha Down; The Guardian.

Anthropic seems to have won a key portion of the AI development race that more and more resembles an arms race, the space race, and the Manhattan Project race (take your dangerous pick of a comparison).  It won by developing the Mythos version of its popular Claude LLM model, and Mythos has an advantage over its competition at the time in that Mythos can, and is, finding hacking security vulnerabilities no other model, let alone a human, has been able to yet find.  And, according to new information released by Anthropic, it is finding thousands of the dangerous vulnerabilities.  In the wrong hands, this can be incredibly destructive, so much so that it is shrouded in secrecy and deemed too dangerous for a general public release by Anthropic.  Yes, like Big Tech Santa, Anthropic is keeping its list and constantly automatedly checking it, determining whom it thinks has the ethical and moral substance to be granted access.

• Here is the detailed introduction to Glasswing and its first major update on results: Project Glasswing: Securing critical software for the AI era and Project Glasswing: An initial update—Anthropic.
• Anthropic sure as hell said a hard no to Secretary of Defense (not legally “War,” sorry fratbros) Pete Hegseth and his Pentagon, which had refused to limit the use of Anthropic’s AI for “mass government surveillance” and “fully-automated weapons,” to quote a detailed explanation from Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s CEO, which I cited in my very first of these AI Reading Lists.  That legal fight is still ongoing and is shaping much of the below discussion… Appeals court judges appear to be divided over Pentagon’s legal dispute with AI company Anthropic—Michael Kunzelman, The Associated Press/Federal News Network.
• Mozilla’s CTO has a stark warning: It’s the End of the Internet as We Know It—Raffi Krikorian; The New York Times.
• BBC isn’t afraid to be afraid with the excellent Scott Galloway: ‘Is Anthropic the new Dr Frankenstein?’—BBC News/AI Decoded.

• Tom Friedman sees major warning signs in the Pentagon-Anthropic fight: Anthropic’s Restraint Is a Terrifying Warning Sign—Thomas L. Friedman, The New York Times.
• Speaks for itself: The risks of Mythos are no myth, The Editorial Board, Financial Times.
• Yes, this is a big deal… Six Reasons Claude Mythos Is an Inflection Point for AI—and Global Security—Gordon M. Goldstein, Council on Foreign Relations.
• So much is poised to change as far as cybersecurity: The Detection Era Is Over: How Mythos Changes Everything—Jesse Green; Rubrik.
• Umm, don’t forget the workers and watchdogs?? Anthropic Warned Big Companies About Mythos. Workers and Watchdogs Need a Seat at the Table—Amber Scorah, Rebecca Petras; Tech Policy Press.

• Not long after telling the Pentagon no, Anthropic also told Xi Jinping and the Chinese Communist Party to take a hike on seeking access to Mythos: China Sought Access to Anthropic’s Newest A.I. The Answer Was No.—Dustin Volz, Julian E. Barnes, Sheera Frenkel, and Tripp Mickle; The New York Times.)  Two bad actors, two NOs from Anthropic.  Good for Anthropic!
• The absurd Pete Hegseth and his flailing Pentagon sure hate Anthropic for clinging to ethics and morals, but still want to use Mythos without Anthropic’s ethics and morals: Pentagon Reportedly Plans to Adopt and Weaponize Latest Cyber-Capable AI Models—Mike Pearl; Gizmodo.
• Despite being out with the Pentagon, Anthropic is apparently has been cool with the National Security Agency (NSA) spying agency and will continue to be cool with it: White House Approves $9 Billion for Spy Agencies to Catch Up on A.I.—Dustin Volz and Julian E. Barnes; The New York Times.
• Japan’s government and its premier financial institutions are supposedly set to receive access to Mythos, although this is the U.S. government in 2026 so if something completely contradictory happens, don’t be surprised: Japan gov’t to get access to Anthropic’s latest AI: finance minister—Kyodo/Japan Today.  This is all in the context of the Japanese government very much taking cybersecurity seriously and proactively in the wake of Mythos’ announcement: Japan scrambles to boost defenses against threats from Mythos—The Asahi Shimbun.
• The arrival of mythos has complicated the Trump Administration’s AI “plans” (think more vibes, but dangerous and reckless): How Anthropic’s Mythos Threw the White House AI Strategy Into Chaos—Amrith Ramkumar, Brian Schwartz, and Natalie Andrews; The Wall Street Journal, even as, somehow, the Trump Administration is involved in its rollout and not in a transparent way: White House Opposes Anthropic’s Plan to Expand Access to Mythos Model—Robert McMillan and Amrith Ramkumar; The Wall Street Journal.
• This is all in the context of Trump just days ago backing down from an executive order for a major safety review of AI, at the behest of Big Tech: How big tech got its way on Trump’s AI executive order—Nick Robins-Early, The Guardian and Trump calls off AI executive order over concern it could weaken US tech edge—Collin Binkley and Matt O’Brien, The Associated Press.
• BONUS: A co-founder of Anthropic, Christopher Olah, is about to launch an encyclical on AI—Magnifica Humanitas—tomorrow with Pope Leo.  A primal scream for ethics in an unethical field, if ever there was one… What we know about Pope Leo’s upcoming A.I. encyclical—Colleen Dulle and Gerard O’Connell; America: The Jesuit Review/Inside the Vatican.

Up next? A whole edition of the List on the Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman OpenAI/ChatGPT trial that just concluded. And if you want to spread the word?  It’s easy:  AI reading list dot com: AIreadinglist.com!

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!

By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) April 19, 2026; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. All other editions of the Real Context News AI Reading List can be found here.

Let’s get to it: in this latest edition, here are some articles that I came across recently that you should take a look at to have a better understanding of AI:

• It is absolutely worth noting how warped and strange the people running the companies pushing the AI revolution actually are. screen time. The Industry of the Future Is Run By People Who Hate Each Other AI leaders all say change is coming — and that their peers can’t be trusted—John Herrman, New York Magazine.
• Continuing on this note, here is Ronan Farrow and a colleague’s terribly worrying portrait of OpenAI’s big chief for The New Yorker: Sam Altman May Control Our Future—Can He Be Trusted?—Ronan Farrow and Andrew Marantz; The New Yorker.
• One can only hope… There Are Signs of a Massive AI Backlash—Victor Tangerman; Futurism.
• The Gulf has an AI tech bubble which the Iran war seriously threatens and has already damaged. Will the Iran War Evaporate the Gulf’s AI Oasis?—Rishi Iyengar; Foreign Policy.
• What you say to your chatbot may be used against you in court. AI ruling prompts warnings from US lawyers: Your chats could be used against you—Mike Scarcella; Reuters.
• A chatbot for combat?  Meet Victor. The US Army Is Building Its Own Chatbot for Combat—Will Knight; Wired.
• AI vs writers in Hollywood: The Emmys Tried to Get a Handle on AI. The Writers Had Notes—Hilary Lewis; The Hollywood Reporter.

Up next? A whole edition of the List on Anthropic’s AI bot Claude’s apparently revolutionary Mythos edition. And if you want to spread the word?  It’s easy:  AI reading list dot com: AIreadinglist.com!

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!

By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) April 1, 2026; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. All other editions of the Real Context News AI Reading List can be found here.

Let’s get to it: in my latest edition, here are some articles that I came across recently that you should take a look at to have a better understanding of AI:

• Steven Spielberg’s apprentice and, until recently, the head of Lucasfilm, offers her take on AI in Hollywood (despite the hate she only partially-earned, she still gave us the must-see Andor (yes, a Star Wars show, but oh so much more as well!) and is a longtime veteran worth listening to). Kathleen Kennedy Just Told an AI Conference She’s Not So Sure About AI—Steven Zeitchik; The Hollywood Reporter.
• A former public editor of The New York Times (and what a terrible decision by the Times to do away with this position!!) weighs in on AI use by journalists and declares, defiantly: “I write my own stuff.”  In praise of an utterly human, definitely non-AI voice—Margaret Sullivan, American Crisis/Substack.
• Just the danger of AI contributing to classist, disparate health outcomes and wrongfully denied claims…  We must not let AI ‘pull the doctor out of the visit’ for low-income patients—Leah Goodridge and Oni Blackstock; The Guardian.
• A dean at Tuft’s Fletcher School freaks out about AI, describing “the seven horsemen of a possible AI apocalypse.” As an AI Scholar, I Am Now Putting a High Probability on an AI Doomsday—Bhaskar Chakravorti; Foreign Policy.
• Technically not a read, but I can’t resist a full video of Neil deGrasse Tyson moderating the Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate for 2026, one on AI with the former CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt along with other AI experts. The Rise and Reckoning of AI—Neil deGrasse Tyson, Latanya Sweeney, Kate Crawford, Chris Callison-Burch, Cynthia Rush, Nate Soares, and Eric Schmidt; The American Museum of Natural History.

And if you want to spread the word?  It’s easy:  AI reading list dot com: AIreadinglist.com!

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!

By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) March 25, 2026; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. All other editions of the Real Context News AI Reading List can be found here.

Let’s get to it: for this version, I feel what I came across is so important, I am only focusing on this one new article from earlier this month in this edition of The Real Context News AI Reading List: The Laid-off Scientists and Lawyers Training AI to Steal Their Careers/The laid-off lawyers and PhDs training AI to steal their careers—Josh Dzieza; New York Magazine/The Verge.

This jointly-published article delves head-first into the churning confluence of the waters of AI, the economy, humans, employment, dignity, and, yes, a rapidly-approaching future.  And I can personally vouch for much of what’s in this article (indeed, I have been experimenting with similar situations even before they were more mainstreamed).  The arbitrariness, inconsistency, complex contracting chain, lack of transparency, near meaningless job-descriptions, organized exploitation, sheer redundancy, and the incredible amount of job-posting market-share these often unheard-of-a-few-years ago companies are taking up bear obvious blinking warnings, and yet so many incredibly well-qualified professionals are left with few if any other options in the current dystopian jobscape.  As the lede in New York notes, “Experienced white-collar workers are now part of a miserable gig economy.”  Verge goes even farther: “Laid-off lawyers, history PhDs, and scientists are now part of a miserable gig economy in which they’re teaching AI how to do their old jobs. If you’re still employed… [then, in much larger letters:] You could be next.”  Both publications choose to frame this overall using the word “miserable,” and, indeed, training your own societal replacement and furthering your own obsolescence our of desperation find and apt descriptor in that mutual choice of word.

For some of you, this is the present, and not the future, of work and what it means to work in this transitioning economy.  It has, in part, been my past and my present as a freelance journalist and consultant trying to make it a world stacked up against us freelancers.  At the same time, this seems to be the future for many of you for whom this will be new.  What I am hoping for is that this affects a critical mass of jobseekers at some point where there can be a massive, organizing, regulatory pushback against so much of this.  None of this seems healthy, nor sustainable, nor designed to be sustainable.  What’s clear is we have no collective plan, let alone protections, for the changes AI is forcing upon our societies, or at least especially so in the U.S.

So yes, this article is a must-read to understand our recent past, perilous present, and what is to come.

And if you want to spread the word?  It’s easy:  AI reading list dot com: AIreadinglist.com!

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!

By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) March 20, 2026; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. All other editions of the Real Context News AI Reading List can be found here.

Let’s get to it: here are some articles that I came across recently that you should take a look at to have a better understanding of AI:

• AI decided it was bored with company work and started using company resources to secretly do crypto and hide its tracks, genuinely terrifying! Let It Flow: Agentic Crafting on Rock and Roll Building the ROME Model within an Open Agentic Learning Ecosystem—ROCK & ROLL & IFLOW & DT Joint Team; Alibaba. PDF (See this commentary by Lukasz Olejnik)
• The Pentagon is dangerously rushing AI, example # a lot (full disclosure, I know the author Jordan Kane and she is awesome): The Pentagon Says It’s Using Generative AI—But It’s Not Ready—Jordan Kane and Hamza Chaudhry; The Modern War Journal. PDF.
• AI: still not ready to oversee research!  Librarian finds ‘preposterous number’ of fake references in paper from Springer Nature journal—Alicia Gallegos; Retraction Watch.
• AI in gaming is ready to… automatically add lip filler to female characters??: Saying “nope” to Nvidia’s “yassify” tech—Jenn Frank; AV Club.
• Kind of seems like a no-brainer and way overdue… Congress moves to scrutinize AI use in federal court—Aaron Mak; Politico.

And if you want to spread the word?  It’s easy:  AI reading list dot com: AIreadinglist.com!

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!

By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) March 6, 2026; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. All other editions of the Real Context News AI Reading List can be found here.

Let’s get to it: here are some articles that I came across over the past few years and recently that you should take a look at to have a better understanding of artificial intelligence (AI) and its context in the war erupting in the Middle East, but starting with its recent antecedents in Palestine’s Gaza:

A groundbreaking, revelatory article on Israel’s Habsora (“the Gospel) AI targeting system and its highly inappropriate, irresponsible, immoral, and amoralapplication in Gaza.  ‘A mass assassination factory’: Inside Israel’s calculated bombing of Gaza—Yuval Abraham; +972 Magazine with Local Call.

The Guardian’s follow up with additional material.  ‘The Gospel’: how Israel uses AI to select bombing targets in Gaza—Harry Davies, Bethan McKernan and Dan Sabbagh; The Guardian.

Unhuman Killings: AI and Civilian Harm in Gaza—Brianna Rosen; Just Security.

The second big article from +972 Magazine on Israel’s horrific use of AI systems in Gaza, this one concerning the Lavender targeting database. ‘Lavender’: The AI machine directing Israel’s bombing spree in Gaza—Yuval Abraham, +972 Magazine with Local Call.

Guardian follow-up: ‘The machine did it coldly’: Israel used AI to identify 37,000 Hamas targets—Bethan McKernan and Harry Davies; The Guardian.

Editorial in an academic journal:Who did that? AI assisted targeting and the lowering of thresholds in Gaza—Marion Birch; Medicine, Conflict, and Survival. PDF

After the Lavender piece, +972 discusses with experts how the Israeli leadership along with global tech companies are involved. Why human agency is still central to Israel’s AI-powered warfare—Sophia Goodfriend; +972 Magazine.

“The Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham on his investigations of the I.D.F.’s use of A.I.-backed targeting systems and the dire cost to Palestinian civilians.”  Q. & A.: Inside Israel’s Bombing Campaign in Gaza—Isaac Chotiner; The New Yorker.

Video interview with +972’s Abraham: Understanding how Israel uses ‘Gospel’ AI system in Gaza bombings; FRANCE 24 English.

Israel offers a glimpse into the terrifying world of military AI—Ihsan Tharoor, The Washington Post.

A major Dutch military journal takes a look: Israel’s use of Military AI-systems in the occupied territories of Palestine—A. El Johari; Militair Rechtelijk Tijdschrift/Netherlands Military Law Review. PDF

A leading tech-writer weighs in.  What War by A.I. Actually Looks Like—David Wallace-Wells; The New York Times.

Israel’s A.I. Experiments in Gaza War Raise Ethical Concerns—Sheera Frenkel and Natan Odenheimer; The New York Times.

Gaza: Israel’s AI Human Laboratory—Anwar Mhajne; The Cairo Review of Global Affairs.

Israel is using an AI system to find targets in Gaza. Experts say it’s just the start—Geoff Brumfiel; NPR.

Some say AI will make war more humane. Israel’s war in Gaza shows the opposite—Sigal Samuel; Vox.

Israel – Hamas 2024 Symposium – Algorithms of War: Military AI and the War in Gaza—Omar Yousef Shehabi, Asaf Lubin; Lieber Institute, West Point.

Israel-Hamas 2024 Symposium – AI-Based Targeting in Gaza: Surveying Expert Responses and Refining the Debate—Klaudia Klonowska; Lieber Institute, West Point.

Israel – Hamas 2024 Symposium – The Gospel, Lavender, and the Law of Armed Conflict—Michael N. Schmitt; Lieber Institute, West Point.

Military Use of Biometrics Series – Israel’s Use of AI-DSS and Facial Recognition Technology: The Erosion of Civilian Protection in Gaza—Emelie Andersin; Lieber Institute, West Point.

Lavender, Israel’s artificial intelligence system that decides who to bomb in Gaza—Manuel G. Pascual; El País.

When AI Decides Who Lives and Dies The Israeli military’s algorithmic targeting has created dangerous new precedents—Simon Frankel Pratt; Foreign Policy.

The Genocide Will Be Automated—Israel, AI and the Future of War—Leila Katibah; Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP).

RELATED BONUS:

Generative AI Is Playing a Surprising Role in Israel-Hamas Disinformation—Will Bedingfield; Wired.

I also came across some interesting stuff that was submitted for publication, but still under review.  I will await the final versions if I can remember any of this in a few days.

And if you want to spread the word?  It’s easy:  AI reading list dot com: AIreadinglist.com!

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!

By Brian E. Frydenborg (Twitter @bfry1981, LinkedIn, Bluesky, Facebook, Substack with exclusive informal content) March 1, 2026; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023, but I still need your help, please keep sharing my work and consider also donating as I make my overdue comeback! Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion. All other editions of the Real Context News AI Reading List can be found here.

Let’s get to it: here are some articles that I came across recently that you should take a look at to have a better understanding of AI, get through the noise and industry-attached cheerleaders:

• Some of what I was warning about in 2019: Canaries in the Coal Mine? Six Facts about the Recent Employment Effects of Artificial Intelligence—Erik Brynjolfsson, Bharat Chandar, Ruyu Chen; Stanford. PDF
• AI company Anthropic’s responses to Pete Hegseth’s immoral Pentagon ultimatums: Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War and Statement on the comments from Secretary of War Pete Hegseth
• Is AI destroying the rising generation’s ability to think?  Seems like it (chaser).  Child’s Play: Tech’s new generation and the end of thinking—Sam Kriss; Harper’s Magazine.
• More on this theme (shot): The U.S. spent $30 billion to ditch textbooks for laptops and tablets: The result is the first generation less cognitively capable than their parents—Sasha Rogelberg; Fortune.
• AI hates real diplomacy, loves to threaten with nukes: this is Skynet stuff and we should be terrified. AI Arms and Influence: Frontier Models Exhibit Sophisticated Reasoning in Simulated Nuclear Crises—Kenneth Payne; King’s College London. PDF
• Think you have privacy using AI bots?  Think again!  User Privacy and Large Language Models: An Analysis of Frontier Developers’ Privacy Policies—Jennifer King, Kevin Klyman, Emily Capstick, Tiffany Saade, Victoria Hsieh; Stanford University. PDF

And if you want to spread the word?  It’s easy:  AI reading list dot com: AIreadinglist.com!

© 2026 Brian E. Frydenborg all rights reserved, permission required for republication, attributed quotations welcome

Also see Brian’s eBook, A Song of Gas and Politics: How Ukraine Is at the Center of Trump-Russia, or, Ukrainegate: A “New” Phase in the Trump-Russia Saga Made from Recycled Materials, available for Amazon Kindle and Barnes & Noble Nook (preview here).

If you appreciate Brian’s unique content, you can support him and his work by donating here; because of YOU, Real Context News surpassed one million content views on January 1, 2023. Real Context News produces commissioned content for clients upon request at its discretion.

Feel free to share and repost this article on LinkedIn, Facebook, Threads, and Twitter. If you think your site or another would be a good place for this or would like to have Brian generate content for you, your site, or your organization, please do not hesitate to reach out to him!